NeurovascularMedicine.com
MEDICAL DISCLAIMER:The contents are under continuing development and improvements and despite all efforts may contain errors of omission or fact. This is not to be used for the assessment, diagnosis or management of patients. It should not be regarded as medical advice by healthcare workers or laypeople. It is for educational purposes only. Please adhere to your local protocols. Use the BNF for drug information. If you are unwell please seek urgent healthcare advice. If you do not accept this then please do not use the website.









Carotid Dissection


Learning objectives

  • Learning
  • Understand
  • Integrate
  • Reflect

Introduction
  • Carotid dissection (CD) accounts for only 1-2% of all ischaemic strokes.
  • In young individuals and middle-aged adults it accounts for 10-25% of these event
  • Carotid or vertebral dissection without evidence or suspicion of SAH is not a contraindication to thrombolysis.
  • Always ask about unusual neck position or turning or trauma in young strokes
Aetiology
  • Dissection occurs when there is a tear in the intimal layer of a blood vessel with bleeding and haematoma formation within the vessel wall.
  • The haematoma may be due to an intimal tear and entry of luminal blood or from vasa vasorum or both.
  • This can lead to overlying thrombus or vessel stenosis or occlusion.
  • The clot can cause complete or subtotal occlusion of the carotid artery or vertebral.
  • Damage to the endothelium means that the vessel loses its natural "non-stick-surface" and so clot can form on the luminal intimal surface and cause artery to artery embolisation which is the rationale for anticoagulation/antithrombotic therapy.
  • There is a small risk that dissections can extend proximally, and as intracranial vessels are more fragile with a risk of SAH.
  • This may temper any desire to anticoagulate and as all of this is an evidence light area, so different clinicians may have different ways to manage these perceived risks.
Epidemiology
  • Always consider this diagnosis in a young adult (under 50) with an anterior circulation stroke unless alternative cause is evident.
  • The prognosis is felt to be good with a very low rate of recurrence.
  • Dissection may be precipitated by any accidental neck trauma or cervical manipulation.
  • Carotid dissection is about 3 times commoner than vertebral. Commonest in those in their mid 40s but seen at any age.
  • This most commonly occurs in the internal carotid artery approximately 2-3 cm after the bifurcation.
  • A very small minority (2%) associated with Marfan's syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos Type IV or Fibromuscular dysplasia
  • Males and females are equally affected.

Clinical
Presentations of Carotid Dissection
  • TIA/Stroke and asymptomatic dissection discovered at imaging
  • Symptomatic dissection without stroke/TIA
  • Neck pain, Facial pain and retro-orbital pain anywhere along the internal carotid artery up into the face and behind the eye.
  • Ipsilateral Horner's syndrome due to damage to sympathetic supply that runs with carotid with mild ptosis, small pupil, enophthalmos
  • Anhidrosis is usually not seen as the sudomotor fibres have exited to travel with the external carotid artery to the face
  • Migrainous type headache
  • Hypoglossal nerve weakness due to compression of the 12th cranial nerve
  • PACI or TACI type stroke due to Carotid occlusion or emboli to MCA
  • Subarachnoid haemorrhage with severe thunderclap headache is rare when dissection extends intracranially

Causes of Dissection seen recently

  • A sneeze or other violent neck movement.
  • Sports such as cricket and rowing.
  • Blow to the head causing torsional forces - hit with a football.
  • Following a road traffic accident.

Some possible associations with dissection
  • Sports: cricket, soccer, rugby, rowing
  • Yoga, painting a ceiling, coughing, vomiting, sneezing
  • Anaesthesia, and the act of resuscitation
  • Chiropractic manipulation of the neck
  • A recent history of a respiratory tract infection e.g. coughing
  • Migraine possibly
  • Road traffic accidents

The issue with chiropracter manipulation is that it may be done to ease neck pain which may have been due to a dissection. It may just be association rather than causation for some.

Left Carotid Dissection and Right Carotid Dissection

Imaging
  • CTA or MRA are the preferred non-invasive diagnostic imaging tests for patients with a suspected cervicocephalic artery dissection, as neck ultrasound does not fully visualize the vertebral arteries and can miss distal or carotid dissection originating above the angle of the jaw
  • T1 fat-suppression technique (wall haematoma): crescentic flap within the left internal carotid artery can be seen on MRI T1 with fat suppression/saturation. This crescent-shaped rim of hyperintense signal adjacent can be matched with a narrowed segment of artery on angiography. Infarction if it occurs is either embolic or due to complete occlusion of the vessel. There is a more tapered appearance than seen with an embolic or in situ blockage.
  • MRA/CTA/DSA shows obstruction or tapering of the artery
  • MRI/DWI may show embolic stroke within the distribution of the affected artery
Management
  • ABC and acute thrombolysis/thrombectomy is indicated. Vessel rupture is very rare indeed and dissection is not a bar to reperfusion therapies.
  • The main therapy is anticoagulation/antithrombotic therapy to reduce risk of thrombus formation and embolism and to maintain vessel patency. In those with dissection but no stroke or TIA the main risk seems to be in the subsequent 2 weeks but even then risk is low [3]. There is a lack of evidence regarding the use of anticoagulation in intracranial arterial dissection
  • The choice has been between Aspirin, clopidogrel and warfarin or even a DOAC. Many would nowadays opt for the ease of using an antiplatelet agent for at least 6 months. The CADISS trial showed no appreciable benefit with warfarin treatment. Choice of therapy depends on whether dissection has been accompanied by a stroke, the size of stroke and risks of haemorrhagic transformation.
  • If the patient presents with an acute stroke then thrombolysis should certainly be considered and carotid dissection with out suspicions of SAH is not a contraindication.
  • Risk of recurrence seems low especially if the provoking mechanism is avoided. [Debette S. 2009].
Further reading and references